When I was a child in school, I would listen as the teachers told me about how slaves were not allowed to learn to read. It was thought that an educated slave would be dangerous or may rebel. I learned also about how the glass ceiling kept women from advancing in our nation and how WWII was the turning point for women.
At a previous employer, I knew a manager who worked in our Corrections division - feeding prisoners. He told me that the key to success in his division was to fill the prisoners up with rice. Rice for breakfast, rice for lunch and rice for dinner. I asked why and he told me that rice is cheap, filling and because it is a heavy start, rice keeps the prisoners tired. They would be less likely to cause problems if they were tired or sleeping.
I have described three very well known and successful methods for those in power to keep those considered inferior in their respective times, under control. Today, only one of them is reasonable. Keeping a group down, is the only idea I can imagine for what our first lady is doing to our school children under the new Federal School Lunch Program. Unlike the convicts littering our prisons today, our government has decided to starve our children. After all, a starving child is also calm and tired, just like our well-fed prisoners. For those who would say, "your not a parent, so you have no say in the matter", I say, bite me! Since I was a child, I am perfectly qualified to make the determination that a child needs to eat to stay alive.
This all stems from meetings I have had with vendors showing me which items are considered "nutritious", under the 2014 guidelines as set forth by Michelle Obama. It is important to understand this as she will likely be planning a run for President against Hillary and a few unknowns, all of whom are more likely to be qualified than either Michelle or Hillary.
As I looked at these items, which must be offered in K-12, if any snacks are made available; I could not help but feel very sad for every kid in every school. What's more, these disgusting morsels are not really all too nutritious by many expert's standards. For example, there was a snack made with raw almonds and pure cane syrup. A hearty, tasty snack which was held together by the cane syrup. It was not sweet but it is satisfying. It did not qualify because of the "sugar" it contained. It was high in good fat, high in fiber, high in potassium, high in fiber (sugar) but nope. The next item, about half in thick, an inch wide and about two inches long. This item had nut by-products, grainy texture and an off=putting sweet taste - think old peanut butter. The first ingredient was "whole grains" and the second was high fructose corn syrup. Now, I am thinking because virtually every expert considers HFCS the worst food on the planet, and I agree; and a growing number are starting to realize that grains of any kind, are really not too good for you. I knew right away that this product would never qualify. WRONG! This morsel qualifies because the first ingredient is whole grain. All the garbage that follows whole grain not-withstanding, this is considered nutritious - the entire cavity full.
The next item was called simply, "Fruit Chips". Now it was not enough that the product inside this tiny bag weighed less than the tiny bag, but the taste...the only word I could come up with was STUPID! This product was awful! I asked the supplier if anyone really expected people to feed this to their children? I can assure you, the Obama girls will not be dining on this product, named appropriately since it should be categorized with another well know natural chip. In fact, cow chips may actually taste better - let's assume so. When I sampled this product, I could not finish even one, and I eat healthy and natural food regularly. This product though, tasted like garbage in the literal meaning. It tasted like I would expect an apple to taste like if it was picked from the ground in October, after sitting for several weeks and after the dog relieved himself on it a few times. This is one item which a person would be grateful with it's small size since you would not be wasting much when you spit it back into the bag.
This, my friends, is the example of what will qualify as food for our children beginning next month or so says our president's wife. Leaving our school vending machines will be unsalted trail mix, fresh fruit larger than a couple ounces, 1 or 2% milk - only skim milk, only white and no more than 8 ounces. Also gone will be Special K Popped Chips, candy of any kind or size, salads and fruit smoothies, however fruit juice which is mostly sugar, can stay as long as it is 10 ounces or less.
Our first lady has determined that it is better to starve our children - keep them malnourished, than to let them run and exercise to stay healthy. With the food we will be feeding our kids in schools, they will no longer have the energy to run or jump. They will only be able to sit in their desks, absorbing the drivel which our schools are force-feeding children as a method of indoctrination. After 12 years, those who live will be brain-washed into believing that they cannot think for themselves. Those who die will be envied.
I hear people talking about how conservatives are not willing to work with the administration. I hear the president crying like a sniveling baby about the same thing. Are we so stupid that we buy this nonsense? Have we become so complacent that we would allow our government, those who ruined healthcare, the VA, the post office and social security; to tell us that they are better qualified to decide what we or our kids should eat? Have we lost our frig-gen heads? No, I am not a parent and for my sake it is a good thing because if I had a child who was about to be fed compost, I would be pissed and everyone including Michelle, would know it. Before you starve our American children, let's see you feed your kids some rabbit shit and see if they like it.
No comments:
Post a Comment